Host果蝇 vs WTCENTX — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs WTCENTX (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-30.
果蝇 vs WTCENTX — normalized performance, 2026-10-26 to 2026-10-30T18:16:02
| 果蝇 | WTCENTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000000000000 | $48.35 |
| Market cap | $7.83K | — |
| 24h volume | $1.35M DEX | $2.08M DEX |
| Liquidity | $345.10K | $328.79K |
| FDV | $26.24M | $892.48K |
| Holders | 1,815,204 | 6,227 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 7 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WTCENTX measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~292× the holder count of WTCENTX
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved 0.00% while WTCENTX moved −11.8%
What the data says
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
WTCENTX
There's a small gap on this page — WTCENTX's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the market side, WTCENTX brings a $328.79K pool, 6,227 holders and 7 days old as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $328.79K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 6,227 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or WTCENTX?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K and WTCENTX (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or WTCENTX?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and WTCENTX (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and WTCENTX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-26 and 2026-10-30T18:16:02, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at 0.00% and WTCENTX at −11.8%.
More comparisons
HLX vs 果蝇RAIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs RENDERCRV vs 果蝇RENDER vs WTCENTXWTCENTX vs ICPHLX vs WTCENTXRAIN vs WTCENTX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-26→2026-10-30T18:16:02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.