Host果蝇 vs CNPY — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs CNPY (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-30.
果蝇 vs CNPY — normalized performance, 2026-10-26 to 2026-10-30T18:16:02
| 果蝇 | CNPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000000000000 | $0.2011 |
| Market cap | $7.83K | $30.52M |
| 24h volume | $1.35M DEX | $21.28M DEX |
| Liquidity | $345.10K | $329.72K |
| FDV | $26.24M | $8.57M |
| Holders | 1,815,204 | 14,572 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 34 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CNPY measures ~3,899× the market cap of 果蝇
- CNPY measures ~16× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~125× the holder count of CNPY
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved 0.00% while CNPY moved −30.1%
What the data says
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
CNPY
CNPY on BNB Smart Chain — 0xc69b16cf18cea1e5d0bb6a1a9db802097790ddd2 — is an eleven-day-old token running the hottest turnover profile in this index slice: $330 thousand of liquidity against roughly $29.9 million of 24-hour volume in the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Eighteen times the pool depth cycling daily is an extreme reading even by BSC's momentum-market standards. For volume to reach that multiple, the same capital is round-tripping the pool continuously — the profile of coordinated desk flow or wash-adjacent activity rather than thousands of independent buyers. It says the market around CNPY is loud; it says nothing about how many distinct hands are doing the trading.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or CNPY?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K and CNPY (BNB Chain) measures $30.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or CNPY?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and CNPY (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and CNPY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-26 and 2026-10-30T18:16:02, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at 0.00% and CNPY at −30.1%.
More comparisons
HLX vs 果蝇RAIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs RENDERCRV vs 果蝇RENDER vs CNPYCNPY vs ICPHLX vs CNPYRAIN vs CNPY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-26→2026-10-30T18:16:02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.