NexFlow › Library › Phantom vs Backpack
Phantom vs Backpack: the Solana wallet that spread out vs the one that dug in
Both are Solana-native wallets built in the same era, but they answered “what is a wallet for” oppositely. Phantom became the multi-chain default; Backpack kept Solana at the core and grew an exchange, a licensing stack, and an NFT empire around it — including buying FTX's old European arm.
Phantom and Backpack both started life as Solana wallets in the same three-year window, but they executed opposite expansion plans. Phantom went wide — every major chain, the biggest install base, monetization through in-wallet flows. Backpack went deep — its own NFT standard, its own collection, its own exchange, and eventually a European license acquired by literally buying a piece of FTX.
Every row below names its source and date.
The parameter table
| Parameter | Phantom | Backpack |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | 2021, Solana-native browser wallet; grew into the ecosystem's default as DeFi and NFT seasons hit (public record). | Announced Jun-2022 by Coral — the team behind the Anchor framework — around the xNFT standard: executable apps living inside the wallet (Coral/Backpack announcements). |
| Chain reach | Solana, Ethereum, Polygon, Bitcoin, Base, Sui — horizontal spread to wherever users are (Phantom docs). | Solana-first with EVM support; depth over breadth — the wallet is the portal into Backpack's own stack. |
| Source model | Closed-source client; the brand is the audit surface. | Open-source wallet and xNFT app layer — Backpack ships its code. |
| The ecosystem play | No exchange, no token, no NFT collection — monetizes via swap fees (~0.85%) and perps routed through Hyperliquid. | Wallet + Mad Lads xNFT collection + Backpack Exchange — a vertically owned stack; holding a Mad Lad is VIP 1 on the exchange (Armani Ferrante, Jan-2025). |
| Funding | ~$150M Series C at ~$3B valuation, Jan-2025. | $20M round Sep-2022 co-led by FTX Ventures — ~$14.5M of it was on FTX when it collapsed six weeks later; survived in “cockroach mode” (The Block). Series A early-2024 valued the exchange ~$120M. |
| Exchange layer | None — swap widget and Hyperliquid-routed perps inside the wallet. | Backpack Exchange — Dubai VARA-licensed, and the Jan-7-2025 acquisition of FTX EU (~$32.7M, MiFID II license, ~110K former users) with responsibility for distributing court-approved claims (Blockworks, The Block). |
| Incident file | iOS forced-logout bug (Nov-2024, no loss); ecosystem's Slope drain hit Phantom users in Aug-2022 — not Phantom's code, but its userbase. | Mad Lads mint Apr-21-2023: bot floods + a DDoS extortion attempt answered with a fake “honeypot” mint that cost bots ~$250K (refunded) — then $8.2M in 24h volume, a Solana record (Decrypt, PRNewswire). |
Two answers to the same question
Phantom treats the wallet as a universal tool. Since 2021 it chased users wherever activity went — EVM chains, Bitcoin ordinals, Sui — and kept the interface deliberately consumer-simple. It does not run an exchange or issue a token; the business is swap fees and routed perps. The bet: distribution beats verticalization.
Backpack treats the wallet as a portal into an owned stack. Coral's xNFT standard makes NFTs executable applications inside the wallet — Mad Lads doubles as a membership pass and a demo of the tech. The same entity runs Backpack Exchange, so the portfolio view and the venue are one company. The bet: an integrated stack with regulatory licenses beats being a thin client over other people's venues.
The FTX thread, in both directions
The FTX collapse sits at the center of Backpack's story twice over. Founders Armani Ferrante (ex-Alameda engineer) and Tristan Yver (ex-FTX US strategy) raised $20M six weeks before FTX imploded — roughly $14.5M of it was held on the exchange and lost, forcing what Ferrante called “cockroach mode.” Mad Lads minted out of that wreckage in Apr-2023 and posted Solana's biggest NFT day.
Then in Jan-2025 the circle closed: Backpack acquired FTX EU for ~$32.7M — the MiFID II-licensed European arm with ~110K former users — taking on the court-approved duty of returning FTX EU customer fiat. The FTX estate publicly disputed details of the announcement, which is itself part of the record. Few companies can claim both sides of that story: burned by FTX, then licensed through its remains.
Different risk shapes
Neither wallet holds your keys — both are self-custody — so the risk file is about what each attaches you to. Phantom's exposure is ambient: being the default Solana wallet made its userbase the target in the Aug-2022 Slope-linked drain (Slope's leaked seed storage, not Phantom's code) and keeps it the top target for drainer kits generally. Its Nov-2024 iOS forced-logout bug caused panic but no loss.
Backpack's exposure is concentrated: your wallet, your exchange account, and possibly your NFT membership are one company's stack. That company now operates under Dubai VARA and EU MiFID II regimes — real regulatory surface — but it also means venue risk, KYC surfaces, and a bankruptcy-claims operation all live behind the same login you trade from.
What the xNFT bet actually is
Backpack's distinguishing technology is the xNFT — an executable NFT standard where the token itself contains an application that runs inside the wallet. The pitch is a curated app store you carry with you: games, tools, and dApp front ends as collectible objects, no browser tab required. Mad Lads was built as the proof — an NFT that opens into a story experience — and it worked: the Apr-21-2023 mint survived bot floods and a DDoS extortion attempt (answered with a honeypot mint that soaked ~$250K from bots, later refunded) and still set Solana's 24-hour NFT volume record at $8.2M.
Phantom never built an app platform — its answer to “what runs inside the wallet” is swaps, staking, perps, and a dApp browser connection model. Six years in, the xNFT ecosystem stayed narrower than the original app-store ambition, but it gave Backpack something Phantom lacks: a native reason for users to stay inside the wallet, and a community asset that doubles as exchange loyalty tier.
Which wallet for which user
Pick Phantom if you want the widest chain coverage, the most battle-tested install base, and a wallet that stays a wallet — clean, closed-source, multi-chain, with perps if you want them. Pick Backpack if you are Solana-deep and want the integrated stack: xNFT apps in-wallet, an exchange with real licenses, and the Mad Lads ecosystem. They install side by side fine — plenty of Solana users carry both: Phantom for reach, Backpack for the stack. The wallets cost nothing to try in parallel — import the same seed into both and the addresses will agree, since both follow the standard derivation paths for Solana.
Frequently asked
Is Phantom or Backpack safer?
Both are self-custody. Phantom is closed-source with the largest target painted on its userbase (drainer kits aim at it); Backpack is open-source but concentrates wallet + exchange + NFT membership in one company's stack. Different exposure, neither custodial.
Did Backpack really buy FTX?
FTX EU — the MiFID II-licensed European arm — for ~$32.7M, announced Jan-7-2025. Backpack EU distributes court-approved fiat claims to ~110K former FTX EU users and plans EU perps. The FTX estate disputed parts of the announcement.
Was Backpack affected by the FTX collapse?
Yes, before it was an exchange: Coral raised $20M co-led by FTX Ventures in Sep-2022 and lost ~$14.5M held on FTX six weeks later — “cockroach mode,” per Ferrante. Mad Lads launched out of that in Apr-2023.
What are xNFTs?
Backpack's executable NFT standard: tokenized applications that run inside the wallet instead of linking out to sites. Mad Lads was the flagship — Apr-21-2023, $8.2M 24h volume, a Solana record.
Does Phantom have an exchange or token?
No — monetization is in-wallet swap fees (~0.85%) and perps routed through Hyperliquid. Backpack runs the exchange; Phantom stays a pure wallet.
Which chains does each support?
Phantom: Solana, Ethereum, Polygon, Bitcoin, Base, Sui. Backpack: Solana-first with EVM support — narrower reach, deeper integration.